The real labour fight of the next five years isn’t man VS machine. It’s leaders VS their own wishful thinking.

In partnership with

Act I: The great corporate land-grab

The 1849 California Gold Rush saw miners pay more for picks and whiskey than they ever pulled from the ground in the hope that everyone would be a millionaire. Today's corporate version is the "gen-AI land-grab," and it's just as chaotic. Forrester surveyed 657 software executives and found most are still buying shovels (GPU clusters, flashy pilots) before they have a geological map in their hands. 63% launched a generative AI feature in the last six months, yet barely a third of them can explain how it will create repeatable revenue.

The hangover has already begun. Enterprise AI adoption literally stalled this quarter because CFOs were blindsided by open-ended inference bills. Cursor is feeling the fallout of that. In other words, FOMO is expensive; strategy is cheaper.

Act II: What Agentic AI actually changes

Enter the agents. Unlike today's chat-box assistants, agentic AI plans + acts + course-corrects on your behalf. Capgemini pegs the prize at $450 billion in added value by 2028 across 14 major economies. Yet the same report shows trust in fully autonomous agents has collapsed from 43% to 27% in just twelve months. Reality bites when invoices come through.

Cue the obvious punchline: we’re not focusing enough on the outcomes right?

While this is true, there’s more to it. The best outcomes so far keep humans firmly "in the loop." Integrated teams (humans supervising agents, agents teeing up humans) beat human-only teams on productivity, creativity, and morale. Turns out collaboration still scales better than hand offs, even with an agentic workforce.

Act III: What it means for humans

The IMF estimates 40% of all jobs carry meaningful AI exposure; 60% in advanced economies like the US, UK, and Australia. But exposure does not equate to human extinction. Think of agents as escalators, not teleporters: they raise the floor you stand on, but you're still the one going up the stairs.

Jobs fragment into three buckets:

1. Automatable drudge (for example filling in a CRM - I am happy to never do this again, see ya later)

2. Augmentable craft (for example financial modeling with a copilot - I’ll happily take some help here)

3. Irreplaceable judgment (complex negotiations, interdisciplinary problem-solving - I trust myself and myself only on this)

The winners aren't the ones who bet on the 3rd bucket alone; they're the ones who use savings gained in the 1st bucket to buy time for more of the 3rd bucket.

Act IV: 5 sharp moves you can make before the bots unionize

1. Audit toil, not titles. Map the tasks nobody loves (invoice matching, quarterly access reviews) and run the first pilots there. Results measured in hours recovered, not model complexity.

2. Fix your data exhaust. Garbage data + smart agent = weaponized garbage. Invest in workflows, access controls, and a single accountability owner before the first LLM starts ‘working’. AI might do the work, but keep one human on the hook.

3. Install circuit-breakers. Mandate human sign-off for anything safety-critical (loans, diagnoses, code deploys). Oversight is cheaper than scandal.

4. Upskill horizontally. Today's "prompt engineer" is tomorrow's Excel power-user: the one person in every team who bends tools to strategy. Spread that literacy fast, and don’t outsource everything to the tech guy.

5. Operationalize trust. Publish guidelines for AI usage, appoint someone on the team to focus on the ethical implications of your AI implementations, and audit agents quarterly. Regulators from Washington to Westminster already expect it and that’ll blow up next year as a topic.

Curtain Call

Yes, agents will erase roles; but they'll also create a premium on the very things machines still envy: context, curiosity, and conscience. The firms that thrive will pair disciplined experimentation with a ruthless focus on human value. Everyone else will likely either be too busy paying cloud overages to notice the escalator moving, or they’ll just be using AI in their decks as a product marketing tool.

The gold rush is real, but the ore is in workflow design and human enablement, not in the compute. So grab a hard hat, sketch your data flows, and - most importantly - decide where your unique judgment is worth triple-time. That's the only seat the bots can't occupy.

Cited sources:

And now a link to a partner who provides some awesome AI resources!

Find out why 1M+ professionals read Superhuman AI daily.

In 2 years you will be working for AI

Or an AI will be working for you

Here's how you can future-proof yourself:

1. Join the Superhuman AI newsletter – read by 1M+ people at top companies

2. Master AI tools, tutorials, and news in just 3 minutes a day

3. Become 10X more productive using AI

Join 1,000,000+ pros at companies like Google, Meta, and Amazon that are using AI to get ahead.

Sign up and start learning AI